THE PHYSICOLOGY OF WAR.



A gay couple strolling past graffiti on the Berlin Wall depicting German leaders Leonid Brezhnev and Erich Honecker sharing a kiss, August 1993.

PSYCHOLOGY OF WAR LES^SENCE ECOLOGIAL MODELS & THE PEACE LOGICAL PROCESS.


The psychology of war centers on the argument that human beings are inherently violent. This violence is fueled and escalated by humans transferring their resentments into hatred against other nations, races, religions and ideologies. This theory suggests that a nation state will preserve order in its own society while simultaneously creating an outlet for aggression through warfare projected against a rival nation.

The majority of studies on the subject of the psychology of war are arguments based upon evolutionary psychology. This area of research makes the suggestion that war is an extension of animal behavior, with examples being animal territoriality and competition. In 1974, biologist Jane Goodall documented what she called a war between groups of chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park of Tanzania. In addition to Goodall's research, wildlife expert Sir David Attenborough has spoken about groups of chimpanzees making raids into neighborhood territories.

There are three models of study that look into the psychology of war: biological, ecological and social-structural. Biological models examine the importance of the links between human and primate violence, as well as the acknowledged associations between success in war and success in reproduction. This idea proposes that violent conflict is a critical factor in shaping human evolution and that this natural selection has produced a cultural preference for war.

LES^SENCE Ecological models make the suggestion that PSYCHOLOGY WAR can actually have a positive outcome for smaller societies. Theorists argue that warfare plays a role in mediating relationships with the environment. Historically, warfare has been ethnographically noted to create and maintain space between settlements, relieve tensions and prevent further degradation of natural resources.

The Italian psychoanalyst Franco Fornari believes that war is an extension of mourning. Fornari has also suggested that war and violence develop out of mankind's need for love and the wish to preserve and defend the sacred object to which we are attached. In this case, it would the nation in question that an individual holds as a sacred and revered object. In his research, Fornari focused on the sacrifice an individual makes for their country, tribe or beliefs as the essence of war. Meanwhile,

In addition, there is a psychological theory in relation to warfare that looks at the leaders of the nations involved in the fighting. This argument stresses that the general population is more ambivalent or neutral in their feelings towards war and that wars only occur when leaders with a psychological disregard for human life are placed into power. Some psychologists believe that war is in actual fact caused by leaders who seek it. Examples of these includ ,mobutu sese seko,Laurent-Désiré Kabila, Josehp kabila  Leaders most often come to power in times of crisis when the population votes for a decisive leader, who in turn takes the nation down the road to war.

Research has suggested that certain aspects of the national psyche make some nations more likely to wage war than others. While not the only causes of war and genocide, there are factors that increase the likelihood of scapegoating and violence, some of which are present in many countries. Psychologists suggest that if war is a natural component of human nature, then it is highly unlikely that mankind will always create wars and conflicts.

LES^SENCE ECOLOGICAL MODEL SOLUTIONS .

Although warfare can be seen as having a natural cause, technological advancements have sped up the destructive nature of mankind. Examples of this include the machine gun, nuclear and biological weapons. These advancements have brought human destructiveness to an irrational and damaging level but from the other site .

Theories in lifesplan development Advocates of the psychodynamic perspective believe that inner forces, memories, and conflicts are outside an individual’s consciousness motivate behavior. •Freud’s psychoanalytic theory presupposes that everyone’s personality has three aspects: othe idothe egoothe superego•According to Freud’s theory of psychosexual development, children pass through a series of stages characterized by pleasure or gratification, which are focused on a particular biological function and body part.•Erik Erikson’s theory of psychosocial development focuses on our interactions with and the understanding of one another, as well as the awareness of the self as a member of society and argues that development continues throughout the lifespan. •The behavioral perspective suggests that the key to understanding development lies in observable behavior and outside stimuli in the environment. •John B. Watson was interested in what motivates learning. He used two types of learning, classical and operant conditioning, to show that.

Les^sence behavioral perspective suggests that the key for the Africa Economical Development will show,s the future 3 KEYS strategys bases implentment.

  1. U.S.A MILITARY BASE IN CONGO-ZAIRE
  2. C.I.A  CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY CONGO-ZAIRE
  3. NASSA FIRST LOCATION IN AFRICA CONGO-ZAIRE
U.S.A Milatary Base.

This is a list of military installations owned or used by the United States Armed Forces currently located in the United States and around the world. This list details only current or recently closed facilities; some defunct facilities are found at Category:Closed military installations of the United States.

An "installation" is defined as "a military base, camp, post, station, yard, center, homeport facility for any ship, or other activity under the jurisdiction of the Department of Defense, including leased space, that is controlled by, or primarily supports DoD's activities. An installation may consist of one or more sites" (geographically-separated real estate parcels).

The United States is the largest operator of military bases abroad, with 38 "named bases"having active-duty, National Guard, reserve, or civilian personnel as of September 30, 2014. Its largest, in terms of personnel.

Countries with United States military bases and facilities

Geopolitical Outreach: Network of Military Bases
The US has established its control over 191 governments which are members of the United Nations. The conquest, occupation and/or otherwise supervision of these various regions of the World is supported by an integrated network of military bases and installations which covers the entire Planet (Continents, Oceans and Outer Space). All this pertains to the workings of an extensive Empire, the exact dimensions of which are not always easy to ascertain
US Military Bases to Protect Strategic Energy Resources
The establishment of U.S. military bases should not of course be seen simply in terms of direct military ends. They are always used to promote the economic and political objectives of U.S. capitalism. For example, U.S. corporations and the U.S. government have been eager for some time to build a secure corridor for US.-controlled oil and natural gas pipelines from the Caspian Sea in Central Asia through Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea. This region -has more than 6 percent of the world’s proven oil reserves and almost 40 percent of its gas reserves. The war in Afghanistan and the creation of U.S. military Bases in Central Asia are viewed as a key opportunity to make such pipelines a reality.”

Military Bases Used for the Control of Strategic Renewable Resources & Resistance Movements
The network of US military bases is strategic, located in prcximity of traditional strategic resources including nonrenewable sources of energy. This military presence has brought about political opposition and resistance from progressive movements and antiwar activists LES^SENCE sustuinable Group Believe that will be the perfect solution fot the abolution of conflicts & guerrilla in CONGO-ZAIRE.

C.I.A CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY

CIA Vision, Mission, Ethos & Challenges Vision.
CIA’s information, insights, and actions consistently provide tactical and strategic advantage for the United States.

Mission
Preempt threats and further US national security objectives by collecting intelligence that matters, producing objective all-source analysis, conducting effective covert action as directed by the President, and safeguarding the secrets that help keep our Nation safe.

Ethos
The officers of the CIA are guided by a professional ethos that is the sum of our abiding principles, core values, and highest aspirations. This ethos holds us on course as we exercise the extraordinary influence and authorities with which we have been entrusted to protect the Nation and advance its interests. CIA’s ethos has many dimensions, including:

Service
We put Nation first, Agency before unit, and mission before self. We take pride in being diverse, inclusive, agile, responsive, and consequential.

Integrity. 
We uphold the highest standards of lawful conduct. We are truthful and forthright, and we provide information and analysis without institutional or political bias. We maintain the Nation’s trust through accountability and oversight.

Excellence.
We bring the best of our diverse backgrounds and expertise to everything we do. We are self-aware, reflecting on our performance and learning from it. We strive to give all officers the tools, experiences, and leadership they need to excel.

Courage.
We accomplish difficult, high-stakes, often dangerous tasks. In executing mission, we carefully manage risk but we do not shy away from it. We value sacrifice and honor our fallen.

Teamwork.
We stand by and behind one another. Collaboration, both internal and external, underpins our best outcomes.Diversity and inclusion are mission imperatives.

Stewardship.
We preserve our ability to obtain secrets by protecting sources and methods from the moment we enter on duty until our last breath.

Key Challenges
Close intelligence gaps with enhanced collection and analysis on the countries, non-state actors, and issues most critical to the President and senior national security team.
Fulfill our global mission to give customers decision advantage as they confront an unprecedented volume and diversity of worldwide developments that affect US interests.

Leverage technological advances for better performance in all mission areas—collection, analysis, covert action, and counterintelligence—while protecting against technological threats to the security of our information, operations, and officers.Improve the ways we attract, develop, and retain talent to maximize each CIA officer’s potential to contribute to achieving mission.
Better manage Agency resources during a period of fiscal austerity.

Why is NASA important
NASA also known as the National Aeronautics and Space Administration had contributed a lot to different fields of study. With the era of modern civilization, a lot of discoveries have been made because of NASA.
NASA was created by the US government in 1958. Its main role is to explore outer space and the heavenly bodies. From the time of its existence until now, it has produced a lot of scientific investigations which made the universe a more interesting subject to study on. There were breakthroughs introduced especially in the discoveries of new heavenly bodies. With this, NASA has become an important part of human lives and the lives to come.
NASA has also created satellites for leaning things about the Earth and its behavior. It has sent probes that explore the mysteries of the solar system. The spaceships sent humans to the moon to better understand how any why the moon exist.
NASA is important because it creates weather satellites that observe climatic changes and weather patterns of the earth. Through this, possible solutions can be made regarding weather disturbances. 

NASA also helps predict possible happenings in the outer space such as the occurrence of comets, revolutions of planets, the attacks of asteroids, etc. By learning this things, humans become more aware of what is really happening around us. We are given a clearer picture of the vast universe which before was only considered a theory.

NASA CENTERS

LES^SENCE sustainable SWISS group  strategy is focused in the economical development in Africa, we believe the American Dream should be Possible in AFRICA.The strategy shows that the implenment of U.S.A segurity FORCES  will bring Eco Evouliton, Segurity and Economical segurity in AFRICA Countries special in CONGO-ZAIRE.

The most beutiful mind part will be the possibility of Solar energy development, Internet around the countries and the definitiv disarmed.

Kommentare

Beliebte Posts aus diesem Blog

LES^SENCE Drawing on sustainable concepts

THE TWINS FACTORS & THE BENEFICIAL MECANISME

WE ARE ALL HUMANS... EDUCATION IS WHAT WE CLAIM.